In S. Korea, a shrinking space for speech- The Washington Post 외, 정봉주판결 외, 나꼼수..

  • #104219
    구름 24.***.99.30 4318

    The Washington Post


    In S. Korea, a shrinking space for speech

    By Chico HarlanPublished: December 22

    SEOUL — Heavily wired South Korea is policing its Internet in new and aggressive ways, giving citizens less room to say what they want about their leaders, their society and, in some instances, their combative neighbor to the north.

    The tactic reflects a government that has trained itself to stay on guard for threats. Officials here describe South Korea as a democracy in perpetual defense mode, needing special measures to maintain order on an ideologically divided peninsula — one that becomes even more volatile after North Korean leader Kim Jong Il’s death.

    “We need to preserve social order,” said Han Myeong-ho, an executive manager at South Korea’s Internet watchdog commission.

    For South Koreans, 80 percent of whom use high-speed Internet, government meddling has long been a part of Web surfing: Anybody here who tries to visit an official Pyongyang Web site, for instance, will be redirected to a warning message, explaining that the site is blocked by government regulations.

    But in several recent cases, critics say, South Korea has gone too far, cracking down on speech that wouldn’t draw attention in most democracies.

    This week, South Korea’s Supreme Court upheld a ruling against one of the country’s most popular political commentators, who co-hosts a podcast that criticizes President Lee Myung-bak. The court said Chung Bong-ju, 51, was guilty of spreading rumors about Lee’s connection to an alleged stock fraud. Chung faces a one-year jail term.

    “In America, it’s almost impossible to prove defamation against a public figure,” Chung said in an recent interview, before the Supreme Court determined his case. “Here it’s easy. . . . When people open their mouths now, they are regulated.”

    The Internet watchdog

    Largely, the conservative South Korea tightened regulations by using existing laws — ones that previous administrations found little use for — in more heavy-handed ways.

    South Korea’s Internet watchdog, the Korea Communications Standards Commission, was created in 2008, empowered to patrol the Web for obscenity, defamation and anything that threatens national security. It’s technically an independent organization, but its nine members are appointed by the president.

    One U.N. official, after a trip to South Korea in May 2010, said the KCSC “essentially operates as a censorship body.”

    The KCSC doesn’t directly carry out the blocks, but its recommendations are almost never rejected; Internet service providers face large fines if they don’t comply, and message board operators can be jailed.

    Three years ago, South Korea blocked some 2,000 Web sites on the grounds they threatened national security; it now blocks more than 80,000.

    Just weeks ago, the KCSC created a team to monitor social networks such as Twitter and Facebook. After Kim’s death, some South Korean Web users posted tweets wondering whether they’d be punished for expressing condolences. The Justice Ministry said such messages would not violate the law.

    No room for mockery

    South Korea has become particularly sensitive about criticism of its politicians, as shown in the case of Song Jin-yong, 41, a financial worker in Seoul. In June 2010, Song created a Twitter account that he used almost exclusively to ridicule the president. The account’s name was part of the attack: It coupled Lee’s nickname (“2MB”) with a sound-alike reference to a common Korean curse word.

    But this year, the KCSC blocked access to Song’s Twitter account, saying the account’s name “disgusts the general public.” Police took up the case, alleging, in one report, that Song used his account to “harm Lee Myung-bak’s social reputation.” Song faces an $850 fine.

    Song had long considered himself apolitical, but with Lee in office, he became frustrated with some of South Korea’s most ­talked-about problems: a widening income gap, rising household debt, government corruption. He told as much to the KCSC panel several months ago, when he headed to a meeting room at its headquarters and officially appealed the decision to block his account.

    The account name, Song told the panel, was a “creative” reference to a swear word — but not a swear word itself.

    “The president has been selected by the majority of the nation,” the KCSC panel’s vice chairman, Kwon Hyuk-bu, told Song, according to an official transcript of the meeting. “It is normal for people to avoid swearing against the president.”

    “I think everybody has the right to mock the president and criticize,” Song replied.

    The KCSC denied Song’s appeal. Only one member expressed concern about the decision.

    By most measurements, South Korea reflects one of the world’s most successful — and rapid — transformations, moving in 25 years from a military dictatorship into a model democracy. Almost half of its 48 million people own smartphones.

    But the country’s older generations follow the codes of their youth: Criticism of the country’s decision-makers remains almost unheard of. South Korea’s three dominant national newspapers skew conservative, the difference only in degree. The government meddles in the hiring of some television executives, whose networks follow a similar line, media experts and politicians here say. The result is that South Korea’s mainstream news media provide one narrative about the nation, and Web surfers embrace an opposite one — a more critical one — online.

    A 2011 U.N. report about freedom of __EXPRESSION__ in South Korea describes an “active and vibrant” Internet culture that is stifled by several vague laws, which prosecutors use to take up defamation cases and national security violations. The increasing frequency of such lawsuits, the report said, risks a “chilling effect on the right to freedom of __EXPRESSION__.”

    In Song’s case, the restrictions on his Twitter account only brought him more attention. The KCSC has the authority to block domestic Web surfers, but it cannot block access through smartphones, so Song can tweet with his iPhone. He has more than 23,000 followers, many of whom access his tweets via cellphone. These days, he says, he targets more of his criticism at the KCSC than the president.

    “I am trying to enjoy the fight,” he said.

    Special correspondent Yoonjung Seo contributed to this report.

    Los Angeles Times

    Popular South Korean podcast host sentenced to a year in jail

    REPORTING FROM SEOUL — A member of a popular South Korean free-speech performance group on Thursday was sentenced to a year in jail in a move activists call a government crackdown on the Internet.

    Jung Bong-ju, 51, one of the four hosts of the popular South Korean podcast “I’m a Weasel,” or “Naneun Ggomsuda,” was found guilty of spreading false rumors. The one-time legislator will also lose his eligibility for reelection for 10 years.

    Many here call the judge’s decision a political death sentence.

    Jung, a member of the opposition Democratic Unity Party, reportedly accused then-presidential candidate Lee Myung-bak in 2007 of being affiliated with BBK, a company that forged stock prices.

    “I’m a Weasel,” a free weekly audio podcast, which can be downloaded from Apple’s iTunes store and Korea’s “Daily Tackle” website, ranks as the world’s most popular political podcast, with 2 million weekly downloads and 6 million hits in average.

    The unscripted program features host Kim Ou-joon, a radio personality, and a supporting cast — former legislator Jung, an investigative reporter and a radio producer — in a format that is equal parts talk show, rant session and comedy skits.

    In November, the podcast was awarded the Democratic Media Award, a top honor in the South Korean media.

    Many are raising questions about the timing of the trial and Jung’s arrest. Postponed for three years after he was indicted, the verdict is seen as a push to stop the popular podcast.

    “I’ve been involved in both politics and law, so I knew that the Supreme Court is a very political place,” Choi Jae-cheon, a lawyer and former legislator who belongs to the same party as Jung, said in an interview with a news blogger after the verdict. “To be honest, internally we didn’t have much hope.”

    The Democratic Unity Party held a press conference at the National Assembly Thursday.

    “Finding Jung guilty is a political verdict and a political revenge where the judicial justice has been torn  down,” a statement read.

    Jung Bong-ju, relatively unknown before the podcast rose to fame, played a character with endless self-bragging comments. He was given the nickname of “funnel,” because everything he says boils down to self-praise. But his barbs of South Korean politics, and often President Lee, were often seen as straight on.

    His online fan club “Jung Bong-ju and the future powers,” has nearly 150,000 members. His book on current issues, “Run, Jung Bong-joo,” came out a month ago and is still ranked among the top-selling books.

    On Thursday morning, in front of the South Korean Supreme Court where the trial was held, hundreds of citizens gathered to rally for Jung. After the verdict that found Jung guilty was made, the former legislator came out to make a short speech.

    “I had my hopes up, but now it looks like the rest of three hosts will have to carry on with the podcast,” Jung said. “I believe the three hosts will keep on doing the job of informing you on what you all must know.”

    Many broke into sobs as Jung added, “Maybe today or tomorrow I will be going to jail.” After he finished the speech, Jung took a deep bow on the ground, with his forehead resting on the gray asphalt.

    Through various social media platforms, the South Korean netizens voiced their anger over the verdict.

    “Where is justice in this country?” one blogger ranted. “I can’t believe that the government thinks its citizens are blind. If they can’t read that, they’ve done something that would ignite the built-up public discontent on them, they are in a big trouble.”

    The main host, Kim Ou-joon, said “the podcast will continue until President Lee’s term of office ends.”

    But now, with Jung’s arrest, the podcast faces uncertainty.

    “There are a lot of people inquiring about what’s to happen to the podcast,” Kim told a South Korean newspaper. “But we will announce our position only through the podcast.”

    Right after the verdict, the team reportedly recorded the last episode that will feature Jung Bong-ju —  at least for now.

    RELATED:

    In South Korea, defectors see death of Kim as offering hope

    Man’s call for Obama assassination is free speech, not crime, court rules

    South Korea’s ‘Weasel’ ferrets out the funny

    — Jung-yoon Choi

    Los Angeles Times

    COLUMN ONE

    South Korea’s ‘Weasel’ ferrets out the funny

    Wildly popular podcast host Kim Ou-joon takes on any and all politicians, but his favorite target is President Lee Myung-bak. It’s a daring move in a country with little tradition of political humor.

    • Share740
    South Korean political humor

    Kim Ou-joon, an outspoken and influential South Korean political commentator who spreads his barb-filled humor through a weekly podcast called “I’m a Weasel,” is wildly popular, except with the politicians who fall under his withering criticism. (Matt Douma, For The Times / November 18, 2011)