-
H.R.3012 Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act
지역구는 사시는 곳에 따라 바꿔 주세요.
I am writing as your constituent in the 3rd
Congressional district of Iowa. I am writing as your constituent in the
3rd Congressional district of Iowa. I am writing as your constituent
in the 3rd Congressional district of Iowa. I oppose H.R.3012 – Fairness
for High-Skilled Immigrants Act, and am tracking it using
OpenCongress.org, the free public resource website for government
transparency and accountability.I oppose S.1857 and H.R.3012 – Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act.
These
bills are not solving any real immigration problems and just targeting
to mitigate the issue of one nation at expense of others. There is a
common believe that a nation can’t get more than 7% of visas. But due to
concept of “spill-overs” backlogged nations can claim unused visas.
For example the most backlogged nation already received 21% of all
Employment-Based Immigration visas available in 2010. H.R.3012S.1857
supporters prefer to focus on 7% cap and not on real numbers.The
changes these bills propose won’t benefit US economy in a long term
because they will result in elimination of diversity among high-skilled
workers in some areas (for example IT).Despite the name these
bills benefit a single nation and hurt others. For example there are
more than 32,000 applicants in EB-2 ROW (Rest of World) category who
applied under current system. New rules will result in up to 5 years of
additional wait time for most of them. People from backlogged countries
anticipated the wait when they applied for visas.I believe
these bills are unfair in light of the reasons I stated above. They
need serious changes before becoming the law to ensure that 1)
Diversity of high-skilled workforce won’t be affected, 2) Wait time of
people who applied under current law won’t be extended.Sincerely,