-
오늘 헤드라인을 장식하는 관심 기사중의 하나가 아마도 아만다가 4년 동안 옥살이하던 이태리 감옥에서 풀려난 항소심 판결입니다. 이 또한 얼마전의 유명한 Casey Anthony의 무죄판결 만큼이나 사람들의 관심을 끌고 있는데, 단지 다른 점은 이태리에서 벌어진 살인사건이라 미국과 이태리에서의 반응은 아주 대조적이네요. 누가 범인일까 하는 의문이 계속되는 가운데에 의미심장한 분석을 한 어느 분의 댓글이 눈에 띄어 여기에 올려봅니다. 여러분은 어떻게 생각하시는지 궁금합니다 … (그나저나 자식을 해외 교환학생으로 잠시 보내는 것도 쉽게 결정할 사항이 아닌 것 같습니다. 특히 딸인 경우에는) … 어휴.Seriously? this wasn’t even near a fair verdict. As we all know the Italian government CAN and WAS bought! The two students family have enough money to get the most expensive lawyers in Italy. I find it very difficult to believe that two out of the three defendants are innocent. The third defendant was found guilty who happens to be a unemployed drifter, oh he also happens to be black. Guess which one was going to be the scapegoat?
Below are several things to think about.
Knox said she was there when the murder took place, then says she was with her boyfriend.
Knox implicates innocent bar owner.
A staged break in took place.
Knox takes a shower in blood splattered shower.
Soliceto says he cannot remember whether Knox was with him on the night of the murder.
Soliceto says he was on his computer the night the murder took place, this has proved to be not the case.
Both Knox and Soliceto turned their phones off when the murder took place.
Imo, third defendant, they got off because the Italian police made a complete mess of collecting DNA.
They can’t even get their stories right and they have no alibi’s, but yet their free..