니가 말한 판례는 이거임
15 N.Y.3d 946
Court of Appeals of New York.
Azad ANAND et al., Appellants,
v.
Anoop KAPOOR, Respondent.
Dec. 21, 2010.
이 판례를 설명하자면 While playing golf with two friends at a nine-hole course in Suffolk County, defendant Anoop Kapoor “shanked” a shot, striking plaintiff Azad Anand in the left eye, with the errant ball. The accident occurred during play on the first hole. Kapoor’s second shot landed in the “rough.” Without waiting for Kapoor to retrieve his ball, Anand went to look for his on the fairway. Kapoor, meanwhile, found his ball and, without calling “Fore” or giving any other warning to his friends, hit the shot that went in an unintended direction and struck Anand. Anand suffered retinal detachment and permanent loss of vision in the injured eye.
즉, 다친 원고가 피고인 Kapoor를 기다려주지않고 무리하게 원고의 페어웨이를 살펴보려고 스페이스를 침범하다가 다쳤기때문에 니가 말한 판례를 글쓴이의 케이스에 적용시킬수 있는지 확실하지 못한상황임…
어휴 ㅋㅋ 백날 변호사 아닌사람이 구글링해봐야 실제 변호사가 westlaw나 lexisnexis 같은 판례전문 서치 사이트로 30분찾는것보다 훨씬 효율이 떨어짐 ㅋㅋ
글쓴분 상황은 안타깝지만 재판들어가려면 변호사의 도움은 필요함 ㅋㅋ