비영리 기관이 모두 H1B 쿼타의 면제를 받는 것은 아니고
대학, 대학 부설기관, 정부/비영리 연구소 등만 면제를 받습니다.
다음에 제가 쓴 답글을 참조하십시오.
https://www.workingus.com/v2/gnu/bbs/board.php?bo_table=visa&wr_id=257768
그런데, 법에 이런 비영리 연구소/대학에 의해 고용된 “employed by”가 아니라
이런 곳에서 고용된 “employed at”이라고 되어 있기 때문에,
staffing company라도 실제로 근무하는 곳이 쿼타의 면제를 받는 곳이면 가능할 수 있습니다.
그러므로, 원글님의 경우, 쿼타의 적용이 없이 바로 H1B를 신청하려면
실제로 일을 할 병원이 어떤 곳인지 확인해야 할 것입니다.
만약 그곳에 대학 부설 병원이거나 affiliated된 곳이면 가능하지만
그렇지 않으면 안될 것입니다.
참조:
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.f6da51a2342135be7e9d7a10e0dc91a0/?vgnextoid=fa7e539dc4bed010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=fa7e539dc4bed010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCRD&CH=afm
Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM)
–> Table of Contents
–> 31.3 H1-B Classification and Documentary Requirements.
(g) Adjudicative Issues .
(13) Cap Exemptions Pursuant to 214(g)(5) of the Act .
(A) “Employed (or has received an offer of employment) at”
Sections 214(g)(5)(A) and (
of the Act (Section 103 of AC21) exempt an alien from the H-1B cap if the alien is “employed (or has received an offer of employment) at “an institution of higher education, a related or affiliated nonprofit entity, a nonprofit research organization, or a governmental research organization (hereinafter a “qualifying institution”).”
Commonly, qualifying institutions petition on behalf of current or prospective H-1B employees and claim this exemption. In certain instances, petitioners that are not themselves a qualifying institution also claim this exemption because the alien beneficiary will perform all or a portion of the job duties “at” a qualifying institution. For purposes of this paragraph, such petitioners are referred to as “third party petitioners.”
A third party petitioner is one who petitions on behalf of an H-1B worker who will work “at” a qualifying institution, but where the alien is or will be employed by the third party petitioner, not the qualifying institution. These types of cases should be adjudicated based on the guidance provided below.
이 link에 있는 추가 설명을 읽어 보십시오.